Rabu, 05 Juni 2013

The NYC DOE Desperation - Its A Long Shot

The Common Core: A Bizarre but Revealing Picture Tells a Thousand Words

June 5, 2013
LINK
IMG_0979
A couple of days ago a bizarre if not surreal poster appeared on the entranceway wall of the school in which I work. Issued by the New York City Department of Education, touting both the challenges and wonders of the highly dubious educational cure all Common Core State Standards, the poster is aimed at New York City parents. In large print are the words: “ This Spring We’re Aiming Higher.” It makes a point of warning parents, among lots of fluff, that on account of the rising standards of the Common Core, their childrens’ all revealing test scores will go down this year.
But not to worry, parents, the poster goes on to say, in the end, because of the Common Core, your kids will be prepared “for college and a career.”
Nothing-new here. This kind of drivel about the wholly untested Common Core has been repeated with cast iron certainty ad nauseum from coast to coast.
But the words are accompanied by a photograph and it is here that things get interesting. The picture of what appears to be a 10 year old boy shooting a basketball at a basket that is not merely distant but ludicrously distant. The child appears to be almost beneath the opposite basket. To tell this child this is a challenge is to not understand the meaning of the word. The child has not a prayer of making the shot. Indeed, neither would many grown men. But then again, most grown men would know what the little boy in the picture would not: there is only one scenario where one would even consider taking such a shot — a moment of absolute desperation when your team is behind at the buzzer and you fling the ball and hope for the best. And they would know something else: they would know that only an absolute fool or an absolute sadist would have you practice such a shot.

It is, to say the least, a curiously cruel choice of a metaphor, particularly considering the audience it is aimed at. If some gym teacher had my kid taking such shots I’d question not merely his or her competence, but his or her sanity. Indeed, only someone with no knowledge whatsoever of basketball or the fragility of a child’s psyche would ever request such a moronic task. It virtually insures failure. Yet, for all its absurdity it is completely consistent with the towering arrogance and self-righteous certainty of the promoters ( and owners and profiteers ) of the Common Core and indeed, all of the “education reformers.” After all, this is the same crew that under the No Child Left Behind act insanely demand that every child in America be proficient in English and Math or they shut down their schools.
All of this, of course, could be dismissed as making too much of a silly poster but for the fact that while musing over the image I could not help but recall Diane Ravitch’s prescient comments on a purloined copy of this years Common Core aligned fifth grade English Language Arts test: “ I read the passages and the questions based on them. My reaction was that the difficulty level of the passages and the questions was not age-appropriate. Based on test questions I had reviewed for seven years when I was a member of the NAEP board, it seemed to me that the test was pitched at an eighth grade level. The passages were very long, about twice as long as a typical passage on NAEP for eighth grade. The questions involved interpretation, inference, and required re-reading of the passage for each question.”
Ravitch’s conclusions on the actual test – that fifth graders were tested with eighth grade level work — could easily be seen as the intellectual equivalent of demanding that little kids shoot a basket from the opposite side of the court: could easily be seen, that is, as exposing either an imbecile’s idea of raising standards or as an integral part an extraordinarily cynical long term plot to set American children up to fail by the millions to create a rationale for privatizing public education.
I see the later.

Minggu, 02 Juni 2013

Francesco Portelos, Chapter Leader, Wins His Grievance

Big Arbitration Win for School Community

As most of you may know, I have been strongly advocating for the students and staff at my community school, Berta Dreyfus IS 49, for quite some time now. A handful of NYC Department of Education employees have been trying everything to prevent me from doing so. Imagine that…people with the responsibility to ensure the safety and education of young children have been throwing barriers in the way of a parent/educator who wants to help.
It took awhile, but see the below arbitration decision that just came in today. It basically states that the DOE has violated the UFT contract, and even their own regulations, when they attempted to prevent me from acting in my capacity as the elected chapter leader. This is a big win for the 91 members at the school as well as the children they serve. Thanks to John Torres who represented me at the grievance back in November as well as David Campbell and Michelle Daniels who I left at the arbitration to run and depose former NYC DOE HR Director Andrew Gordon.
Let’s pay close attention to how the department will react to this. If they follow their past track record, they will try to continue to be divisive. Children last?
Portelos Arbitration Decision Case 13 390 00871 13_Page_1
Portelos Arbitration Decision Case 13 390 00871 13_Page_2
Portelos Arbitration Decision Case 13 390 00871 13_Page_3

I already sent the below email to Principal Linda Hill, so we can start moving in the right direction:
From: Francesco Portelos 
Date: Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:38 AM
Subject: Arbitration Decision
To: Linda Hill
Cc: eclaudi@schools.nyc.gov, mvazquez16@schools.nyc.gov, Sean Rotkowitz , jmckeon3@schools.nyc.gov, Zaharakis Despina , Thomas Fox , kcrossan@schools.nyc.gov, Brodsky David , mmendel@uft.org, mmulgrew@uft.org, RSinger4 , Greenfield Robin , ESchlenoff@schools.nyc.gov
Principal Hill,
     The attached decision, made by Arbitrator Tener, indicates that he found the Department of Education violated several articles of the contract, as well as regulations when you refused to meet with me. In order to follow along with the remedy proposed, could you tell me the first available date you and I could meet to discuss a plethora of issues pertaining to the school? Tuesday works for me. 
     As a reminder, I was elected chapter leader of your school after you and Superintendent Claudio had me removed. I continued to be a strong advocate for the school despite all obstacles thrown in my way by you and many members copied on this email. Those obstacles were not just affecting me, but the staff and students of the school. It shocks the senses that so many people, in a position of power and responsibility for the welfare of children, would try so hard to get in the way of safety and education of children. Many, but not all, attempts to prevent my involvement have been futile. As I understand it, a petition to recall me as chapter leader was circulating around recently and at least one administrator from the CSA was pushing it with some staff members. It did not obtain enough signatures. A year after running the chapter from exile, the staff still prefers me to run your school over anyone else.  I have also heard that you have been calling in my chapter members and questioning them on what they said during a UFT meeting. I suggest you cease and desist with that type of behavior as well or we will move towards more grievances. 
Today, I met with staff members outside on the sidewalk for a UFT meeting. If you notice, most of your staff is wearing blue today. They are not wearing blue because they are for or against anyone. They are wearing blue to show solidarity despite the divide and conquer techniques used against them. 
Where do we go from here? I hope the department does not continue to follow the same crooked path down the wrong direction. Obviously I am not going anywhere. I eagerly await your response.
Please do not circulate any documents pertaining to menu items until we meet. I also expect my school email address to be enabled and to be copied on all staff related emails. 
Thank you and enjoy your weekend.
Sincerely,
-Francesco Portelos
Parent
Educator
IS 49 UFT Chapter Leader

The Issue of Building Codes and Accountability

By the way, several years ago I looked up fire codes and building codes; I found that charter schools and public schools had different rules. How is that, in a co-location?

Betsy Combier

 

EXCLUSIVE: 90% of schools have at least one building code violation: city

There are nearly 1,200 public school buildings and those structures tallied up 9,693 open building and environmental violations. These can include loose wires, stuck doors and inadequate ventilation. I.S. 195 in Harlem had 124 open violations, the highest count of any school building, but 57 schools in total had more than two dozen each.


UPDATED: SUNDAY, JUNE 2, 2013, 2:30 AM


















I.S. 195 in Harlem had 124 open violations, the highest of any school building in the city. In March 2012, Principal Rashaunda Shaw said there was also a ‘problem with rodent and insect infestation.’

CHRISTIE M FARRIELLA/FOR NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

I.S. 195 in Harlem had 124 open violations, the highest of any school building in the city. In March 2012, Principal Rashaunda Shaw said there was also a ‘problem with rodent and insect infestation.’

Education officials fail to make the grade when it comes to keeping public schools free of building code violations and environmental problems, according to city data.
More than 90% of city schools have at least one outstanding building code violation, an analysis of school inspection records by the school cleaners union shows.
Loose wires, stuck doors and inadequate ventilation are just some of the problems at 1,100 school buildings with at least one open violation as of May 23.
Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ President Hector Figueroa said conditions in many of the school buildings could be harmful to students and staffers.
“At the least, these violations are a distraction and a source of discomfort,” said Figueroa. “And in many cases, they could actually present a health hazard.”
The Intermediate School 195 building in Harlem had 124 open violations, the highest count of any school building in the city.
The W. 133rd St. structure houses four schools. It has dozens of violations for problems with elevators, lighting and building maintenance.
Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ President Hector Figueroa said conditions at some of the schools ‘are a distraction and a source of discomfort,’ also noting that ‘in many cases, they could actually present a health hazard.’

SEIU32BJ.ORG

Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ President Hector Figueroa said conditions at some of the schools ‘are a distraction and a source of discomfort,’ also noting that ‘in many cases, they could actually present a health hazard.’

When city inspectors visited in March 2012, IS 195 Principal Rashaunda Shaw said there was also a “problem with rodent and insect infestation” in the building.
The city operates about 1,200 public school buildings and as of Wednesday, those structures had 9,693 open building and environmental violations. Fifty-seven schools had two dozen open violations or more.
Many of the open violations were reported months or years ago. Union officials blamed the slow repairs on cuts to city funding of school maintenance and repair projects.
School capital budgets were reduced significantly in the past several years, union officials said, including a $700 million decrease adopted in fiscal year 2011.
Although some of those cuts were restored in later years, union officials said the 2010-14 school capital budget remains reduced by more than $500 million compared with the 2005-09 budget.
Education Department spokeswoman Margie Feinberg said the agency is spending more than $3 billion in building improvements under its capital plan.
Feinberg said the open violations in city schools are not emergencies and the agency is working to correct them.
“We maintain clean and safe schools,” said Feinberg. “Any serious maintenance-related complaints are addressed immediately, and noncritical complaints are prioritized with the repair work for the building.”

Sabtu, 01 Juni 2013

First Look at New Teacher Evaluation Process

City education department awards itself a win on teacher evals


Screen Shot 2013-06-01 at 7.31.23 PM
Before briefing reporters with their take on the teacher evaluation system that State Education Commissioner John King imposed on the city today, the Department of Education distributed a colorful chart making the case that King had sided with with its proposal.
According to the chart, King fell closer to the department’s position than the UFT’s on several issues, including the number of days allotted for arbitration, the use of student surveys, and the length of the agreement. The chart does not mention other issues where the UFT’s positions won out, such as the number of Danielson Framework components that will count or other details about the way observations will have to be documented.
“I consider this a major victory for our students and our staff,” Chancellor Dennis Walcott said.

Union chiefs offer first takes on state-imposed evaluation plans


UFT President Michael Mulgrew offered what appeared to be a tepid endorsement of the teacher evaluation system that State Education Commissioner John King imposed today,while Mulgrew’s counterpart at the principals union was more favorable about the new plan for rating his members.
Ernest Logan, president of the Council of School Supervisors and Superintendents, said in a statement that his union had actually reached a deal on evaluations with the city Department of Education late Friday, “with the strong intervention of Commissioner King.” He said the deal resembled what had almost been finalized back in January, when the city’s negotiations with the teachers union fell apart just before a state deadline.
Logan praised the new evaluation system, saying that it “preserves many of the same tools our principals are accustomed to while at the same time substantially improving our due process protections and safeguards.” It also provides for helping principals improve, which the old system did not do, he said.
Mulgrew’s reaction was more circumspect. In a statement posted to the UFT’s website shortly after King released details of the plan, Mulgrew expressed satisfaction that teachers will be allowed to challenge the evaluations process before they receive their ratings and that teachers will have an equal say with their administrators in recommending which tools are used to measure student growth.
“New York City teachers will now have additional protections and opportunities to play a larger role in the development of the measures used to rate them,” he said. “Despite Mayor Bloomberg’s desire for a ‘gotcha’ system, as Commissioner King noted today, New York City ‘is not going to fire its way to academic success.’”
But he also signaled that the union has a speedy timeline for seeking revisions to the plan. King announced that the plan would be in effect through the 2016-2017 school year. But Mulgrew said the specifics would remain in effect “unless and until they are altered in collective bargaining with the new mayor who takes office in seven months.”
The evaluation system that King imposed includes some wins for the UFT and some clear losses. Principals will have to consider all 22 components of the Danielson Framework for assessing classroom instruction, which the union wanted. But starting in the 2014-2015 school year, student surveys will count for 5 percent of ratings for almost all teachers — something that the union had vehemently opposed.
The full statements are below. From UFT President Michael Mulgrew:
New York City teachers will now have additional protections and opportunities to play a larger role in the development of the measures used to rate them. Despite Mayor Bloomberg’s desire for a “gotcha” system, as Commissioner King noted today, New York City “is not going to fire its way to academic success.”
The precise measures of student learning established by this ruling will be in effect unless and until they are altered in collective bargaining with the new Mayor who takes office in seven months.
As the UFT requested, there will now be additional arbitration slots that will allow teachers to challenge any violations by supervisors of the new evaluation process before they reach the stage of actual ratings.
The state has also ruled that teachers will be evaluated on all aspects of the Danielson framework, as the UFT had proposed, in opposition to the DOE’s insistence that fewer measures be used.
In individual schools, teachers will have an equal say with administrators on the committee that will recommend the instruments that each school will use.
Despite the Mayor’s claims to the contrary, the major components of the new statewide system – such as the four categories of Highly Effective, Effective, Developing and Ineffective – are part of the statute or are regulations;  as such, have never been subject to “sunset;”  they can be changed by the Legislature or the Commissioner.
And from CSA President Ernest Logan:
After a full day of arbitration yesterday, CSA and DOE reached an agreement on an APPR Plan for Principals. This deal was reached late last night with the strong intervention of Commissioner King, and finalizes the agreement we were on the verge of signing in January. We are pleased to report that our agreement is consistent and reliable as it preserves many of the same tools our Principals are accustomed to while at the same time substantially improving our due process protections and safeguards. For the first time, we’ve negotiated a true yearlong improvement plan for any Principal rated “developing” or “ineffective” with regular cycles of feedback from superintendents. Additionally, we negotiated a strong appeals process, including the step of an independent hearing officer. Our rating scales will continue to yield the differentiated results that our Principal Performance Review has had in the past. We look forward to the implementation of this agreement and will have more details this week.